Image - devolution.gov.nt.ca |
There
has been a lot of talk around the subject of devolution and it is surprising it
has been interpreted to mean dividing the country along tribal lines and or just
one tribal line: Ndebele and Shona. Devolution is not just a Ndebele and Shona thing, but an efficient form of governance that has been implemented successfully in a number of countries.
Is the concept that difficult to
comprehend? Is devolution the reason why Welshman Ncube has been labeled a
tribal leader? Is he a tribal leader because his election campaign was premised on the Devolution is
our new Revolution mantra? My thesis is not based on Welshman Ncube, but on the concept of devolution that the people of Zimbabwe are being prevented from understanding.
I would have
assumed that Zimbabweans, who claim to be the most educated Africans, would
understand that devolution in simple terms is just allowing each province to determine
its own economic fortunes: Have budgets drawn up at provincial level. Have
provincial governments chat the developmental course of the province instead of
taking everything to central government. Isn't it easier to make a provincial
government accountable than take everything to the doorstep of the person of
Robert Mugabe at state house? Why should a burst sewer pipe in the suburb of
Luveve have anything to do with Robert Mugabe? Isn’t it easier to elect a provincial
government into whose offices we can march into at any time and demand
answers?
I would have assumed that
Zimbabweans would understand this and realise that it is a win-win solution for
everyone. Of course there are a few individuals who want total separation of
Mthwakazi from the rest of Zimbabwe but that should not be used to shut down the
noble idea of devolution that is desired by the majority of provinces in
Zimbabwe, not just Matabeleland. Kenya has successfully implemented devolution. Why not us?
‘In Kenya, the constitution approved
in 2010 created 47 new counties that elected officials at the 4 March national
elections. The county governments will have to provide services, but the
earning potential from wooing investors will in some cases be life-changing’ –
writes Parselelo Kantai in The Africa Report.
When launching his party’s manifesto
in Binga a week or so before the general elections in Zimbabwe which were held
on the 31st of July, president of the MDC said, “Here in Binga, you
have your own natural resources. You have your own river, Zambezi. You have
your own fish. Despite the river flowing at your doorsteps you do not have
permission to fish your God-given fish; you are not even allowed to draw water
from the same river,”.
Kenya is about 581, 300 km2 in
size against a population of about 44 million; that’s a bit crowded compared to
Zimbabwe’s size of 390, 747km2 against a population of 13 million.
If Kenya can have 47 devolved counties, surely 10 devolved provinces is reasonable
for Zimbabwe and we should learn from the example and embrace devolution. Each
of the 47 counties will now get a share of the national cake. The division of
revenue Bill provided some KSh210 billion – or 34.5 % of projected revenue –
until 2014 for the 47 counties. County governments can collect property and
entertainment taxes but in return they have to provide core services such as
primary healthcare and transport.
‘Alfred Mutua, governor of Machakos
County – one of 47 new county governments launched in the wake of the elections
in March – was quickest out of the blocks to take his government to the market.
And Mutua’s efforts paid off handsomely: Machakos secured KSh56.3 billion
(US$660million) in investment pledges from more than 20 companies. The projects
ranged from factory to make surgical
gloves to waste disposal and paper re-cycling plants, fruit juice processors
and a company that will manufacture equipment for the disabled. That is without
the multibillion-dollar plans for the Konza Techno City, the so-called
Silicocon Savannah, which is also going to be set up in Machakos…” – Parselelo Kantai
in the Africa Report.
That is devolution; where provincial
governments can determine the economic path of the province, county in the case
of Kenya. Why does that seem to be so difficult to comprehend. We should go to
Harare out of choice not because survival is close to impossible if we don’t
work with the big, great Harare.
No comments:
Post a Comment